More Tips and Techniques for the Home Studio

photo

One of the best ways to avoid musical inertia is to inject a few untried ideas into the recording environment whenever possible, thus avoiding the irreversible recording rut.

By Dave Simons

Remember when you brought home your first really nice recorder? Every night you’d spend hours alone in your room with your guitar in hand, marveling at the sound coming out of this magnificent piece of machinery. Soon the novelty wore off, and so you went out and bought another accessory, which kept things interesting for a few more months. But before long your room was filled with dust-covered gadgets while you sat on the couch watching Leave it to Beaver. That’s when it finally hit you: Cutting tracks just wasn’t cutting it for you any more.

With all due respect to my wife, recording can be kind of like a marriage—it can quickly lose its luster if you’re not careful. While it’s fun to have a new toy to play with every so often (end of marriage analogy), as we’ve mentioned many times within these pages, one of the best ways to avoid musical inertia is to simply inject a few untried ideas into the recording environment whenever possible.

A few years ago, the editors at the late great Home Recording magazine (including myself, Rusty Cutchin, Thad Brown, David Darlington, Michael Ross and Arty Skye) assembled a laundry list of creative ideas for the project-studio user, entitled “Top 100 Recording Tips and Tricks” (a DVD version can be found in the clearance bin at your local video outlet). The following are some highlights from that brainstorming expedition, designed to keep you from falling into an irreversible recording rut:

Try overdubbing electric instruments using studio monitors instead of headphones. Doing so eliminates the claustrophobia and ear wear that can result from too many hours of headphone use. Works great for vocals as well; simply position a speaker (smaller is better, to reduce bass bleed) directly in front of a unidirectional microphone. Any leakage won’t hurt, and you’ll probably sing better as well.

Have your gear set up and ready to go. When the inspiration really hits, you won’t want to lose a single minute hooking up mics or messing with MIDI cables. Therefore, set it up—and leave it up.

The P. A. Way: Get a big, live feel in a little room by running bass drum or vocal signals through a P.A. speaker or two. Works great and is surprisingly easy to control.

Use two different mics on the same instrument and then blend them together to control the tone, rather than adding gobs of EQ. For instance, a bright dynamic mic combined with a warm condenser mic on an acoustic guitar can create a nice, full sound; simply brighten to taste by balancing between the two signals. A great combo for miking guitar cabinets is a Shure SM-57 with an AKG D112 (or any other good low-frequency mic). The 57 picks up the essential mid/high frequencies, while the AKG grabs any low end the Shure ignores.

Go for performance, rather than perfection. There’s no better way to suck the life out of a recording than to perform the same part over and over again. Therefore, when overdubbing, give yourself an approximate time frame for each track, then move on. If you need to record drums before the neighbors hit the hay, once 10 p.m. rolls around, just accept the results—even if you think you could have done it better. A year from now you won’t notice any “mistakes,” but you will notice if the track sounds like you labored over it.

Roam if you want to. Take advantage of the various room sounds around the house-and the portability of your multitracker-by recording instruments and/or vocals in the bathroom, in a hallway, under the stairs, in the basement, etc. A great way to add sonic variety to your demos.

Change your guitar and bass strings. Old, dead strings will give you a muddy tone, while nice new strings will be brighter, cleaner, and deliver a better-recorded range of guitar frequencies. The same goes for percussion—if you have a great drum mic but a poorly tuned drum, all you’ll end up with is a good reproduction of a lousy drum sound. Therefore, always start with a properly tuned, sufficiently tight batter head (ditto for the resonant head, if you use one) that’s in reasonably good condition. If there are any surface breaks near where the beater strikes, consider replacing the head before you record.

During mixdown, adjusting the playback speed a good 10 percent or so will help juice the track and break the monotony of your recording (especially if you’ve been at it for several hours).

Posted Jun 20, 2005

Member Comments

Posted by Gene Nunez on 2005-06-21 at 11:37:36 am

Surprised to see a recommendation that you record vocals with a speaker live in the room. That would work if the vocal is perfect all the way through and no punch-ins are required. If you do punch anything in, you would have to leave all factors including the speaker volume exactly the same so that the “liveness factor” caused by the mic bleed does not change.

Posted by Dave Simons on 2005-06-23 at 1:32:47 pm

True. Obviously the objective here is to go for a complete live performance (or as complete as you can manage). But you can always adjust the monitor level so that bleed is minimized, or, if you do need to fix, do so using the monitor as well so that the punch-ins match (as you suggested).

—DS

Posted by Joe Madigan on 2005-07-02 at 11:23:11 am

I am just starting up my home recording setup. What do you think would be a good setup to start with? I would like to start simple for now, then when I get the hang of things start getting more in depth.

Posted by Dave Simons on 2005-07-17 at 9:10:24 am

Joe, if you’re talking about a basic recorder (which I assume you are), consider a lower-priced digital workstation that has a fair amount of storage, decent built-in processing, etc. Personally I like the Roland machines, which have very nice effects and are pretty easy to work with.—DS

Posted by Brien Holcombe on 2005-07-19 at 11:14:49 pm

Isn’t a computer based system rather than an external box more effective in the long run?

I mean, sure, it’s apples and oranges and how much money ya want to spend’‘’‘but if you have a computer then the disk space is built in…effects just get in the way of someone with little experience.

What do you think?

Posted by Dave Simons on 2005-07-22 at 9:48:28 am

A few good effects can really be helpful—Roland’s COSM processing card, for instance, has very nice compression, reverb & guitar stuff—but, you’re right, as long as you have a computer powerful enough to handle whatever software you’re running, that’s fine. Personally, I don’t really like making music with a mouse & keyboard (reminds me of work), which is why I tend to gravitate towards something standalone. (Of course, I still track to tape, but that’s another story..)

—DS

Posted by Brien Holcombe on 2005-07-26 at 8:14:10 pm

I have a stand-alone….its a dedicated computer with Cakewalk and 120gig of space with a gig of overhead, memory as it is often called.

Effects can indeed make a difference. I suppose what I did not expound on was the current thread of people with access to all this “stand-alone” equipment with soo many effects that the music becomes second and the effects become a nuisance.

You might want to look into getting up to speed, I know you love all the hissing of an analog outfit…but get you some newer gear brother.

Brien Holcombe

Posted by Don Coyer on 2005-07-29 at 3:34:48 am

Dave-
Good to see you around again. I subscribed to Home Recording and still read the back issues. It was a total drag when you guys vanished.
  I had one great piece of luck though…a couple of my recording tips were included in the BEATLES special including a byline.. I wasn’t expecting that, so it was super cool.
Anyway, I miss the mag, but it’s good to see more sites like this appearing. Thanks,  Don Coyer

Posted by Dave Simons on 2005-08-03 at 12:11:42 am

Hey Don—Thanks for the note. I still miss HR—-a really good magazine with good people behind it. Glad you’re still plugging away (and I’ll have to go back and check that Fab 4 issue again!)

—DS

Posted by john rose on 2008-08-30 at 10:59:11 am

Two other nice startup options for people on a budget who want alot of bang for the buck- Korg has two terrific machines, the D1200 (12 tracks with opt. CDRW) and D1600 (16 tracks with opt. CDRW) available on eBay for surprisingly little money, considering all they can do- and they’re a VERY easy machine to use (I own both still). The Korg effects in each are easy to patch, sound really good, and are available as the original silver case models, or a MKII version, in blue cases. The D1600 can be hooked via MIDI cable to link two machines, creating a 32 track setup….with 8 XLR or 1/4” balanced/unbalanced inputs. They’re not as complicated as the Roland machines are, when it comes to the learning curve, either. (And I think they sound better than Roland’s boxes do.)

For my main studio, I’m running a Tascam M2600/24 mixer to an Alesis HD24, with outboard fx. Very cool analog vibe, with the best of digital ability. Fast, reliable, easy to use- and no more ADAT machine failures, or the costly repairs that go with ‘em!

J.R. Rose, WingbackMusic

You need to be logged in to post comments.