Oct 31, 2006, 03:10 AM
Hey Phil, the post you quoted was mine, though the words were my friend’s which in turn were quoted by me. When you say my post “read like an ad for them,” maybe you’d like to be clear about what you’re implying.
Rather than wait for your response, I’ll go ahead and set that straight: I have no experience with Jim and Joe, I’ve never met them and I have no business dealings or financial arrangement with them whatsoever, not now nor have I ever.
I had heard their name through the friend I quoted, who at one time had been a client of theirs. Because this person had spoken favorably of them in the past I initially made the statement, “I believe they are 100% legit.” That was the sum and extent any personal opinion on my part.
The rest is quoted absolutely verbatim, but even though the words are not my own I know this person well enough to vouch that there’s no way I was being pitched. That is the person’s genuine opinion, which is not to say that they can’t be mistaken, but there’s no way that they were attempting to manipulate me nor anyone else. I asked for an honest opinion as a friend and got exactly that. I don’t think the following reads like someone trying to pitch blind faith in the services of a con artist:
“I would be asking tough questions like how many sit-down pitches they got last month, and with whom. Ask them what cuts or holds they have gotten and with whom. Ask if you can see a sample pitching report for one of their baby-writer clients. Follow up with A & R on any pitches they claim to have gotten holds or cuts on.”
You’re entitled to your opinion of Jim and Joe, and I can’t deny that you may be right and my friend might be wrong. It’s not impossible that my friend was taken for a ride. But don’t go implying that I’m posting “ads” for someone who (in your opinion) is a flake and phoney when in fact you have no fricking idea.